
THE STATE HAS REJECTED THE ARMY'S PLAN TO LEAVE SIGNIFICANT CONTAMINATION IN THE TOWN OF TONAWANDA LANDFILLThe twice extended comment period on the Army's "no action" proposal closed on September 13; see news story. FACTS sent a copy of its comments (F.A.C.T.S.' Comments on the Proposed Plan for the Tonawanda Landfill Vicinity Property) to NYS DEC at the end of July along with a request that DEC reciprocate with its comments. While the DEC's Tonawanda Landfill comments call for the off-site removal of most of the MED contamination, the actual concentrations of Uranium-238, Radium-226, and Thorium-230 that the State will allow the Army to leave on the property are not specified. Instead, the DEC call for removal of the MED waste while commendable in itself appears to stem solely from State's solid waste site closure setback requirements rather than from enforcement of the appropriate radiological cleanup standards for this residential area, i.e. Option 1 of the 1981 NRC BTP (see FACTS comments). The State's failure to identify the appropriate radiological cleanup standards in its comments is the result of an attempt to accomodate the Town of Tonawanda. Although it clearly should require their removal, the State has said it will not require removal of the EAD-sourced americium wastes from the Town's landfill. Following the bankruptcy of the EAD smoke detector company (formerly on Ensminger Rd), responsibility for the cost of americium removal fell to the Town. (An unexpected side effect of inexpensive ion chamber smoke detectors). Background: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|